
|
G. Llinás1, D. Rodríguez-Iñesta1, J. J. Mira1, S. Lorenzo2, C. Aibar3
1Departamento de Psicología de la Salud, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche (Alicante), Spain 2Unidad de Calidad, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Alcorcón (Madrid), Spain 3Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
Objective: To evaluate and compare the user-orientation of Spanish, American and British hospital websites. Methods: A descriptive study of 32 hospital portals (12 Spanish, 10 American and 10 British) was carried out in which the following were analyzed: website readability according to the Flesch Index, websites accessibility using the Web Accessibility Test, and the quality of information provided using the “e-Information Scale of Health Care Centers”. Results: Fifty percent of the user-oriented information quality attributes are met. Readability indices tend to be below 60 (standard readability), and only 10 of the 32 websites meet the accessibility criteria. Conclusions: Most portals exhibit accessibility problems that favor computer illiteracy. There is a wide variability in terms of website readability and in terms of useroriented content.
Internet, quality, hospital websites, readability, accessibility
| 1. | ||
Elske Ammenwertha, Frauke Ehlersa, Bernhard Hirschb, Gordon Gratl b IMIA Yearbook 2008 2008 3 1: 54-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.004 | ||
| 2. | ||
N. Aoki, T. Kiuchi Methods of Information in Medicine 2007 46 6: 671-678 | ||
| 3. | ||
H. Kindler (1) , A. E. Baranov (2) , T. M. Fliedner (3) , H. Mall (3) , A. Engelke (3) , D. Densow (3) Methods of Information in Medicine 1999 38 3: 194-199 | ||