|
|
J. Menke (1, 2)
(1) Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; (2) Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Goettingen (GWDG), Goettingen, Germany
Objectives: Meta-analysis allows to summarize pooled sensitivities and specificities from several primary diagnostic test accuracy studies. Often these pooled estimates are indirectly obtained from a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) analysis. This article presents a generalized linear random-effects model with the new SAS PROC GLIMMIX that obtains the pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity directly. Methods: Firstly, the formula of the bivariate random-effects model is presented in context with the literature. Then its implementation with the new SAS PROC GLIMMIX is empirically evaluated in comparison to the indirect HSROC approach, utilizing the published 2 x 2 count data of 50 meta-analyses. Results: According to the empirical evaluation the meta-analytic results from the bivariate GLIMMIX approach are nearly identical to the results from the indirect HSROC approach. Conclusions: A generalized linear mixed model with PROC GLIMMIX offers a straightforward method for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
Meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity, software, statistical models
| 1. | ||
|
Matus Rehak1,2, Jiri Rehak2, Marc Müller3, Susanne Faude1, Frank Faude1, Annelie Siegemund4, Vera Krcova5, Ludek Slavik5, Dirk Hasenclever6, Markus Scholz6, Peter Wiedemann1 Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 5: 925-929 10.1160/TH07-11-0658 |
||
| 2. | ||
|
Augusto Di Castelnuovo1, Manola Soccio2,3, Licia Iacoviello1, Virgilio Evangelista4, Agostino Consoli3, Diego Vanuzzo5, Silvia Diviacco5, Marisa Carluccio6, Lucia Rignanese2,3, Raffaele De Caterina2,3,6 Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 3: 594-601 10.1160/TH07-08-0480 |
||
| 3. | ||
|
O. Kuss1, C. Gromann2 Methods of Information in Medicine 2007 46 6: 662-668 10.3414/ME0422 |
||