Comparison of activated clotting times obtained using Hemochron and Medtronic analysers in patients receiving anti-thrombin therapy during cardiac catheterisation

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-08-0528
Issue:2009: 101/3 (Mar) pp. 413-603
Pages:535-540

Comparison of activated clotting times obtained using Hemochron and Medtronic analysers in patients receiving anti-thrombin therapy during cardiac catheterisation

Stanley Chia1; Elizabeth M. Van Cott2; O. Christopher Raffel1; Ik-Kyung Jang1
1Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Pathology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Summary

Accurate monitoring of anti-thrombin therapy with activated clotting time (ACT) is important to prevent thrombotic and haemorrhagic complications during cardiac catheterisation. Significant variability in ACT tests exists when different analysers are used. Our objective was to compare ACT results obtained using Hemochron® and Medtronic ACT PLUS® devices and anti- Xa activity in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. Thirty- two patients who received unfractionated heparin or argatroban therapy during cardiac catheterisation were enrolled. Blood sampling was performed to determine ACT values using Hemochron and Medtronic (with high-range cartridges) devices in all patients (n=130 pairs), and anti-Xa activity following heparin administration. In the heparin group, ACT tests (n=95 pairs) showed very good correlation (r=0.84, y=1.31x–0.81; p<0.001). However, Hemochron values were consistently higher and the difference more pronounced with increasing ACT (for ACT>150 sec, mean difference 65 ± 48 sec; p<0.001). Both Hemochron and Medtronic ACT tests correlated well with plasma anti-Xa levels (r=0.85, r=0.81, respectively; p<0.001); Hemochron ACT>300 sec corresponded to anti-Xa>1.48 IU/ml. With concomitant eptifibatide therapy, the divergence in ACT was greater compared to heparin alone. In the argatroban group, ACT tests (n=35 pairs) demonstrated excellent correlation (r=0.94, y=0.61x+79.9; p<0.001). In contrast to the heparin group, ACT values were higher with Medtronic compared to Hemochron. Therefore, despite good correlation between Hemochron and Medtronic ACT results, and strong association with anti-Xa activity, Medtronic ACT values were consistently lower compared to Hemochron following heparin anticoagulation. Paradoxically, Medtronic ACT results were higher after argatroban therapy. Understanding this discrepancy is crucial when using ACT to guide invasive cardiac procedures.

Keywords

heparins, Antithrombin, Activated clotting time, cardiac catheterisation

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-08-0528

You may also be interested in...

1.

Helene Hochart1, P. Vincent Jenkins1,2, Roger J. S. Preston1, Owen P. Smith3, Barry White1,2, James O’Donnell1,2

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 3: 570-575

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-06-0424

2.

Peter Raivio1,Anne Kuitunen2, Jari Petäjä5, Sorella Ilveskero4, Riitta Lassila3,4

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 2: 427-434

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-04-0307

3.

Bob Lobo1, Christopher Finch1, Amanda Howard1, Sohail Minhas2

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 1: 208-214

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-04-0252



Articles

You've 202 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...