Major haemorrhage related to surgery in patients with type 1 and possible type 1 von Willebrand disease

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH-07-12-0757
Issue:2008: 100/5 (Nov) pp. 727-954
Pages:797-802

Major haemorrhage related to surgery in patients with type 1 and possible type 1 von Willebrand disease

Adriana Inés Woods1, Alicia Noemí Blanco2, Roberto Chuit3, Susana Sara Meschengieser2, Ana Catalina Kempfer1, Cristina Elena Farías1, María Angela Lazzari1
1Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), 2Departamento de Hemostasia y Trombosis, Instituto de Investigaciones Hematológicas, and 3Instituto de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Summary

Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) frequently bleed under a challenge.The aim of our study was to identify predictive markers of perioperative major haemorrhage in type 1 (VWF:RCo = 15–30 IU dl-1) and possible type 1 (VWF:RCo = 31–49 IU dl-1)VWD patients.We recorded perioperative bleeding complications previous to diagnosis and laboratory parameters in 311 patients with 498 surgical procedures.The patients were grouped according to the absence (A) or presence (B) of perioperative major haemorrhages. Eighty-one patients (26%) and 87 surgical procedures (17.5%) presented major haemorrhages associated with surgeries.There was no difference between the percentage of type 1 and possible type 1 VWD patients who had major haemorrhages (32.6% and 24.8% respectively; p=ns). No difference in the prevalence of O blood group, age, gender, positive family history and laboratory test results (FVIII and VWF) was observed, independent of the haemorrhagic tendency. Bleeding after tooth extraction was the most frequent clinical feature observed in patients with perioperative major haemorrhages. The bleeding score and the number of bleeding sites (≥3) were not predictors of major haemorrhage associated with surgery. Caesarean section and adenotonsillectomy showed the highest frequency of major haemorrhages (24.6% and 22.3%, respectively). In conclusion, type 1 and possible type 1VWD patients showed similar incidence of perioperative major haemorrhages. Laboratory tests and positive family history did not prove to be effective at predicting major haemorrhages in patients that had either type 1 or possible type 1 VWD.The history of bleeding after tooth extraction could define risk factors of major haemorrhage.

Keywords

surgery, Type 1 VWD, major haemorrhage, laboratory and clinical predictive markers

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH-07-12-0757

You may also be interested in...

1.

Juan Ignacio Arcelus1, Manuel Monreal2, Joseph A. Caprini3, Javier Gutiérrez Guisado4, Mª José Soto5, Manuel Jesús Núñez6, Juan Carlos Alvárez7, and the RIETE investigators

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 3: 546-551

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-10-0611

2.

Andreas Straub1,3, Hans Peter Wendel1, Klaus Dietz2, Daniela Schiebold1, Karlheinz Peter3, Simone M. Schoenwaelder4, Gerhard Ziemer1

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 3: 609-615

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-07-0452

3.

R. Weiner

Die Medizinische Welt 2008 59 1: 32-37



Articles

You've 525 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...