Bleeding and re-thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome on oral anticoagulation An 8-year longitudinal comparison with mitral valve replacement and inherited thrombophilia
Paul R. J. Ames 1 , Antonio Ciampa2 , Maurizio Margaglione3 , Giovanna Scenna4 , Luigi Iannaccone4 , Vincenzo Brancaccio4
1 Leeds University Teaching Hospitals, Rheumatology, Leeds, United Kingdom 2 Haemostasis Unit, G. Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy 3 Genetics Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy 4 Haemostasis Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
Summary
The aimof this studay was to compare bleeding and re-thrombosisin primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), mitral valvereplacement (MVR) and inherited thrombophilia (IT) at differentoral anticoagulation intensities. It entailed a prospective 8-yearfollow-up on 67 patients with PAPS,89 with IT and 24 with MVR.Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies detected by Elisa and lupusanticoagulant by clotting assays.At INR 2–3 minor bleeding ratewas higher in MVR (33.3) than PAPS (10.9) and IT(4.2)(p<0.0001).At INR 3–4 minor bleeding rate was higher inPAPS (142) than IT (33.3) and MVR (5.8)(p<0.0001). At eitherINR major bleeding rate were not significantly different acrossthe three groups, but in PAPS major and minor bleeding rates were superior at INR 3–4 than INR 2–3 (p=0.02 and p<0.0001).Re-thrombosis rate was higher in PAPS than IT at INR 2–3 (4.0vs 0.35) (p=0.01) and at INR 3–4 (10.5 vs. nil).The hazard ratiofor re-thrombosis between PAPS and IT was 13 (95% IC1.6–102.2, p=0.015). By regression analysis, baseline IgG aCLtitre (>80 GPL) (p=0.001) and male sex (p=0.03) independentlypredicted re-thrombosis. In conclusion, in PAPS, high intensityoral anticoagulation was not superior to conventional intensityin preventing re-thrombosis but was offset by greater bleedingrates. Male sex and elevated baseline IgG aCL predicted rethrombosisin PAPS that is 13-fold more re-thrombogenic thanIT. DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH04-11-0723