Clopidogrel versus prasugrel in rabbits - Effects on thrombosis, haemostasis, platelet function and response variability

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-07-0456
Issue:2009: 101/1 (Jan) pp. 1-216
Pages:108-115

Clopidogrel versus prasugrel in rabbits - Effects on thrombosis, haemostasis, platelet function and response variability

Pancras C. Wong; Earl J. Crain; Carol A. Watson; Ji Hua; William A. Schumacher; Robert Rehfuss
Thrombosis Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pennington, New Jersey, USA

Summary

The new P2Y12 antagonist prasugrel produces greater inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (IPA) and reduction of thrombotic events in patients versus approved doses of clopidogrel, but increases major bleeding. We examined whether IPA level or P2Y12 receptor occupancy (RO) could be optimized to better balance the efficacy and bleeding effects of these thienopyridines and reduce the response variability in rabbits. Rabbits were given three daily oral doses of clopidogrel (0.3–30 mg/ kg/d), prasugrel (0.03–10 mg/kg/d) or vehicle (n=6–40/group). Electrically-induced carotid artery thrombosis (AT, % thrombus weight reduction), cuticle bleeding time (BT, fold-increase over control), IPA to 20 μM ADP (% inhibition of peak light transmission) and RO (% inhibition of [33P]-2MeS-ADP binding to P2Y1-blocked platelets) were determined 2–3 hours after the last dose. ED50 (doses for half-maximal effect, mg/kg/d) of AT, BT, IPA and RO were 1.6, 6.7, 1.9 and 1.4 for clopidogrel vs. 1.2, 1.9, 0.5 and 0.2 for prasugrel. IPA of 30–40% for both compounds produced the optimal balances of efficacy (AT: 50–60%) and BT of about 2-fold with significant RO of 70–80%. IPA of 50–60% achieved higher efficacy (AT: 60–80%), but with increased BT of five- to six-fold and >90% RO. Box-plot suggests no significant difference in the IPA and RO response variability between both compounds. Clopidogrel was 1.3–7 times less potent than prasugrel in rabbits, depending upon which biomarker was studied. The ratio of efficacy:bleeding was most favorable at a moderate IPA of 30% to 40%. Both compounds had similar IPA and RO response variability.

Keywords

thrombosis, clopidogrel, Haemostasis, platelet aggregation, prasugrel

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-07-0456

You may also be interested in...

1.

Christian Gachet

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 3: 466-472

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-11-0673

2.

Joseph A. Jakubowski1, Christopher D. Payne2, Ying G. Li1, John T. Brandt1, David S. Small1, Nagy A. Farid1, Daniel E. Salazar3, Kenneth J. Winters1

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 2: 409-415

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-09-0575

3.
The EFA-Trial

P. Wenaweser (1), P. Eshtehardi (1), L. Abrecht (1), M. Zwahlen (2, 3), K. Schmidlin (2, 3), S. Windecker (1), B. Meier (1), A. Haeberli (4), O. M. Hess (1)

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010 104 3: 554-562

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-11-0765



Articles

You've 689 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...