Comparison of methods to evaluate clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition after percutaneous intervention with stent implantation

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-09-0577
Issue:2009: 101/2 (Feb) pp. 217-412
Pages:333-339

Comparison of methods to evaluate clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition after percutaneous intervention with stent implantation

Thomas Gremmel1; Sabine Steiner1; Daniela Seidinger1; Renate Koppensteiner1; Simon Panzer2*; Christoph W. Kopp1*
1 Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 2 Clinical Department for Blood Group Serology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Summary

A high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity in light transmission aggregometry (LTA) has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, LTA is weakly standardized, and results obtained in one laboratory may not be comparable to those obtained in another one. We therefore sought to determine the test correlating best with LTA to estimate clopidogrelmediated platelet inhibition in 80 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after elective percutaneous intervention with stent implantation. We selected the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, the vasodilator- stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, multiple electrode platelet aggregometry and the Impact-R for comparisons with LTA. Cut-off values for residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity were defined according to quartiles of each assay. Sensitivities and specificities of the different platelet function tests were based on the results from LTA. The results from all four assays correlated significantly with those from LTA. The VerifyNow P2Y12 assay revealed the strongest correlation (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Sensitivities and specificities ranged from 35% to 55%, and from 78.3% to 85%, respectively. In conclusion, although all assays correlated significantly with LTA, they need to be improved to become clinically used diagnostic tests. Further, it may be too early to define the gold standard method for assessing residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity and generally acceptable cut-off values.

Keywords

platelet aggregation, platelet function tests, Antiplatelet agents

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-09-0577

You may also be interested in...

1.

C. D. Williams (1), G. Cherala (1), V. L. Serebruany (2)

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010 103 1: 29-33

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-06-0375

2.

María González-Díez, Cristina Rodríguez, Lina Badimon, José Martínez-González

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 100 1: 119-126

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-11-0675

3.

Kenneth J. Clemetson, Jeannine M. Clemetson

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 3: 473-479

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-12-0718



Articles

You've 191 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...