Fibrinolytic efficacy of Amediplase, Tenecteplase and scu-PA in different external plasma clot lysis models. Sensitivity to the inhibitory action of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI)

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH06-04-0197
Issue:2006: 96/3 (Sep) pp. 239-389
Pages:325-330

Fibrinolytic efficacy of Amediplase, Tenecteplase and scu-PA in different external plasma clot lysis models. Sensitivity to the inhibitory action of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI)

Ana H. C. Guimarães 1, Marrie M. Barrett-Bergshoeff 2, Marco Criscuoli 3, Stefano Evangelista 3, Dingeman C. Rijken 1
1 Dept of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 2 TNO Quality of Life, Biomedical Research, Gaubius Laboratory, Leiden, the Netherlands and 3 Menarini Ricerche, Preclinical Development Dept, Florence, Italy

Summary

In this study, the in-vitro fibrinolytic efficacy of Tenecteplase, Amediplase and scu-PA was investigated in different external lysis models by measuring the lysis of human plasma clots after the addition of the plasminogen activators (PAs) to the surrounding plasma.The effect ofTAFI was examined for each PA by neutralisingTAFIa with potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor (PCI). The lytic efficacy of Amediplase was lower than that of Tenecteplase at low PA concentrations but slightly higher at therapeutic concentrations. The activity of scu-PA was clearly lower than that of eitherTenecteplase or Amediplase.The TAFI system inhibited external clot lysis mediated by all the PAs when thrombomodulin was present in the model. In the therapeutic range (5–10 µ g/ml) however, the TAFIa effect was negligible for both Amediplase and Tenecteplase. At lower PA concentrations the effect of TAFI on Amediplase was slightly stronger than that on Tenecteplase Under static conditions the lysis rates were lower than with stirring.The role of TAFI was similar under both conditions. In conclusion, at therapeutic concentrations Amediplase was slightly more active than Tenecteplase and scu-PA under all conditions used.ThereforeAmediplase might possibly be a more potent thrombolytic agent at these concentrations and increase the efficacy of thrombolysis.The potential of TAFI for inhibiting thrombolytic therapy is probably low. However in conditions where the local PA concentrations are sub-optimal TAFI might affect the lysis rate.

Keywords

Thrombolysis, fibrinolysis, TAFI, plasminogen activator, Amediplase, Tenecteplase

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH06-04-0197

You may also be interested in...

1.

Fabrizio Semeraro*, Donatella Piro*, Maria R. Rossiello, Tiziana Ammollo, Mario Colucci

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2007 98 6: 1208-1214

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-05-0375

2.

C.-E. Dempfle

Hämostaseologie 2007 27 4: 278-281

3.

Yi-Xin Wang, Valdeci da Cunha, Jon Vincelette, Lei Zhao, Mariko Nagashima, Kohichi Kawai, Shendong Yuan, Kumar Emayan, Imadul Islam, Junko Hosoya, Mark E. Sullivan, William P. Dole, John Morser, Brad O. Buckman, Ronald Vergona

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2007 97 1: 54-61

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH06-09-0552



Articles

You've 559 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...