![]() |
|
D. Hulse (1), B. Young (2), B. Beale (3), M. Kowaleski (4), R. Vannini (5)
(1) College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Surgery, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA; (2) College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA; (3) Gulf Coast Veterinary Specialists, Houston, Texas, USA; (4) College of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, USA; (5) Bessy’s Kleintierklinik, Regensdorf, Switzerland
Objective: To describe the anatomic relationship of the biceps brachii-brachialis muscle complex and the medial compartment of the canine elbow. Study design: Anatomical cadaveric study. Methods: Cadaveric forelimbs, and radius and ulna bones were examined to study the anatomy of the biceps brachii-brachialis complex and its relationship to the medial compartment of the elbow. Results: The biceps brachii and brachialis muscles comprise a large muscular complex. The biceps brachii is a pennate fibred muscle which plays a major role in stabilising the elbow joint during the stance phase and facilitating limb acceleration during the swing phase. Additionally, the insertion of the muscular complex onto the ulnar tuberosity is such that a moment is generated which the authors hypothesise rotates the medial coronoid process against the radial head. The result is a compressive force which generates internal shear stress oblique to the long axis of the medial coronoid process. The authors further hypothesise that this may result in the microdamage or fragmentation of the medial coronoid process. Conclusion: The authors' conclude that contraction of the biceps brachii and brachialis complex may explain an aetiopathogenesis for fragmented medial coronoid process not associated with elbow dysplasia.
medial coronoid process, biceps brachii muscle, brachialis muscle, stress fracture
| 1. | Arthroscopic and imaging findings of medial coronoid disease in 51 dogs | |
K. A. G. Vermote (1), A. L. R. Bergenhuyzen (1), I. Gielen (2), H. van Bree (1), L. Duchateau (3), B. Van Ryssen (1) VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2010 23 1: 43-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-09-03-0032 | ||