Anzeige

Limb lengthening in three dogs using distraction rates without a latency period - Radius/ulna, tibia, femur

Journal:Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT)
ISSN:0932-0814
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-07-08-0079
Issue:2008: Issue 5 2008
Pages:446-450

Limb lengthening in three dogs using distraction rates without a latency period - Radius/ulna, tibia, femur

W. T. McCartney
Marie Louise Veterinary Hospital, Baldoyle, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Summary

Objective: To report three clinical cases suffering from limb shortening secondary to monostotic physeal closure, in which distraction osteogenesis had been performed without a latency period and with high distraction rates. Methods: Three dogs had limb lengthening performed, using an Ilizarov ring fixator in two dogs and a linear dynamic fixator in the other dog.Bone lengthening achieved for a radius /ulna was 27 mm at 2 mm per day , a tibia was 78 mm at 3 mm per day, and a femur of 45 mm was 3 mm per day . Results: Complications related to pin loosening occurred in each case, thus requiring surgical corrective procedures, but these did not affect the final outcome. Lateral bowing of the bar and bone and some musculo-cutendinous contracture occurred in the femur. Fixation frames were on for 12 weeks in Case 1, eight weeks in Case 2 and nine weeks in Case 3. All three of the cases had a good functional outcome. Discussion: The faster rates of lengthening were not associated with any long-term deleterious soft tissue complications, but they were associated with pin loosening and bending of the bar. In each case there was excellent osteogenesis. Conclusions: From the results achieved in these three cases it can be concluded that a latency period prior to distraction osteogenesis may not be necessary. Also, distraction rates up to 3 mm per day can be used to shorten the time needed to achieve lengthening; however further studies are needed to investigate the high level of complications.

Keywords

latency, dog, Limb, lengthening, distraction rates

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-07-08-0079

You may also be interested in...

1.

R. A. Pettitt, J. F. Innes

VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2008 21 3: 302-306

2.

N. Suwankong1, B. P. Meij2, G.Voorhout3, A. H. de Boer2, H. A. W. Hazewinkel2

VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2008 21 3: 285-293

3.

C. W. Bruce, B. A. Brisson, K. Gyselinck

VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2008 21 3: 280-284



Articles

You've 891 Article(s) in your Basket.

VCOT 3/2012

Synoviocentesis of the equine digital flexor tendon. In issue 3/2012 of VCOT, Jordana et al. give...

VCOT 2/2012

The need for revision in non-cemented total hip implants is a growing problem in people who are...

VCOT 1/2012

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture is one of the most common conditions affecting the stifle joint...