Anzeige

Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier?

Journal:Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT)
ISSN:0932-0814
Issue:2008: Issue 3 2008
Pages:202-210

Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier?

J. D. Langhoff1, J. Mayer2, L. Faber3, S. B. Kaestner4, G. Guibert5, K. Zlinszky1, J. A. Auer1, B. von Rechenberg1

1Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse Faculty ZH, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 2TECIM Technologies for Implants and Materials, Niederlenz, Switzerland 3DePuy ACE SARL, LeLocle, Switzerland 4Veterinary Anaesthesiology, Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse Faculty ZH, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 5Centre d’analyse par faisceau ionique (CAFI), Institut des Microtechnologies Appliquées-Arc Neode, La chaux-de-fonds, Switzerland

Summary

Objectives: Titanium implants have a tendency for high bone-implant bonding, and, in comparison to stainless steel implants are more difficult to remove. The current study was carried out to evaluate, i) the release strength of three selected anodized titanium surfaces with increased nanohardness and low roughness, and ii) bone-implant bonding in vivo. These modified surfaces were intended to give improved anchorage while facilitating easier removal of temporary implants. Material and methods: The new surfaces were referenced to a stainless steel implant and a standard titanium implant surface (TiMAX®). In a sheep limb model, healing period was 3 months. Bone-implant bonding was evaluated either biomechanically or histologically. Results: The new surface anodized screws demonstrated similar or slightly higher bone-implantcontact (BIC) and torque release forces than the titanium reference. The BIC of the stainless steel implants was significant lower than two of the anodized surfaces (p=0.04), but differences between stainless steel and all titanium implants in torque release forces were not significant (p=0.06). Conclusion: The new anodized titanium surfaces showed good bone-implant bonding despite a smooth surface and increased nanohardness. However, they failed to facilitate implant removal at 3 months.

Keywords

sheep, titanium, anodised implants, removal torque, bone-implant bonding

You may also be interested in...

1.

S. Meinecke-Tillmann, B. Meinecke

Tierärztliche Praxis Großtiere 2008 36 2: 86-94

2.

A. Crovace1, L. Lacitignola2, E. Francioso1, G. Rossi3

VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2008 21 4: 329-326

http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-07-05-0050

3.

S. Lottner, A. Wehrend

Tierärztliche Praxis Großtiere 2008 36 1: 14-34



Articles

You've 828 Article(s) in your Basket.

VCOT 3/2012

Synoviocentesis of the equine digital flexor tendon. In issue 3/2012 of VCOT, Jordana et al. give...

VCOT 2/2012

The need for revision in non-cemented total hip implants is a growing problem in people who are...

VCOT 1/2012

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture is one of the most common conditions affecting the stifle joint...