
![]() |
|
Original Article
C. N. Nowak (1), A. Neurauter (2), L. Wieser (1), V. Wenzel (2), B. Abella (3), H. Myklebust (4), P. A. Steen (5, 6), H.-U. Strohmenger (2)
(1) Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University for Health Science, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall, Austria; (2) Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; (3) Department of Emergency Medicine Philadelphia, Medical University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; (4) Laerdal Medical AS, Stavanger, Norway; (5) Department of Anesthesiology, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; (6) Institute of Experimental Medical Research, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Objectives: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia and within of minutes of its occurrence, optimal timing of countershock therapy is highly warranted to improve the chance of survival. This study was designed to investigate whether the autoregressive (AR) estimation technique was capable to reliably predict countershock success in VF cardiac arrest patients. Methods: ECG data of 1077 countershocks applied to 197 cardiac arrest patients with out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest between March 2002 and July 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. The ECG from the 2.5 s interval of the precountershock VF ECG was used for computing the AR based features Spectral Pole Power (SPP) and Spectral Pole Power with Dominant Frequency weighing (SPPDF) and Centroid Frequency (CF) and Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) based on Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT). Results: With ROC AUC values up to 84.1% and diagnostic odds ratio up to 19.12 AR based features SPP and SPPDF have better prediction power than the FFT based features CF (80.5%; 6.56) and AMSA (82.1%; 8.79). Conclusions: AR estimation based features are promising alternatives to FFT based features for countershock outcome when analyzing human data.
Prediction, Ventricular fibrillation, countershock success, autoregressive spectral estimator
| 1. | A Comparison of Autoregressive and Fast Fourier Transformed Spectral Estimators | |
C. N. Nowak (1), G. Fischer (1), A. Neurauter (2), L. Wieser (1), H. U. Strohmenger (2) Methods of Information in Medicine 2009 48 5: 486-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/ME0580 | ||
| 2. | ||
M. Welsch1, M. Abeln1, K. Zaplatnikov1, C. Menzel1, H. Ackermann2, N. Döbert1, F. Grünwald1 Nuklearmedizin 2007 46 6: 257-262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3413/nukmed-0078 | ||
| 3. | ||
W. Wölwer, M. Riesbeck, J. Brinkmeyer, W. Gaebel Nervenheilkunde 2006 25 1: 51-56 | ||