Advertisement

Overview

Short stripping of the incompetent great saphenous vein by InvisiGrip® vein stripper

Journal:Phlebologie
ISSN:0939-978X
Issue:2010 (Vol. 39): Issue 2 2010 (57-120)
Pages:77-81

Short stripping of the incompetent great saphenous vein by InvisiGrip® vein stripper

A new scarless surgical technique

G. M. J. M. Welten (1), A. G. Krasznai (1), E. C. M. Bollen (1), J. C. van der Kley (2), R. J. Th. J. Welten (1)

(1) Department of Vascular Surgery, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, the Netherlands; (2) Department of Phlebology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, the Netherlands

Summary

Our aim is to describe the results of a new short stripping technique for the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) using a new developed surgical device. Patients, methods: 397 patients (498 legs) were treated with the InvisiGrip® Vein Stripper, which removes the GSV through a single groin incision, endovascular cutting and antegrade stripping by inversion. We reported the surgical success rate and postprocedural complications. Results: The mean age was 51 years, 74% were women. The success rate for removal of the GSV was 95%. The 23 failures were half patient related, half device related. In 82% of the strippings, one or two attempts were needed to successfully remove the GSV, which was done by invagination in 80%. Age, gender, BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and male GSV diameter were not associated with the number of attempts. Superficial wound infection, haematoma and temporary saphenous and femoral nerve injury occurred in 6 (1.6%), 0, 3 (0.8%) and 7 (1.9%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The InvisiGrip® is highly successful for the removal of the GSV using short inverting stripping. Furthermore, it is simple, safe, associated with good cosmetic results and no preoperative selection of patients is necessary.

Keywords

Varicose veins, vascular surgery, short stripping, InvisiGrip®, saphenous vein

You may also be interested in...

1.

T. M. Proebstle

Phlebologie 2003 32 5: 131-137

2.

R. Fischer 1 , H. G. Kluess 2 , N. Frings 3 , C. Duff 1

Phlebologie 2003 32 3: 54-59

3.

E. Rabe 1 , F. Pannier-Fischer 1 , K. Bromen 2 , K. Schuldt 2 , A. Stang 2 , Ch. Poncar 1 , M. Wittenhorst 1 , E. Bock 2 , S. Weber 2 , K.-H. Jöckel 2

Phlebologie 2003 32 1: 1-14