Advertisement

Overview

Comparison of standardised lymphoscintigraphic function test and high resolution sonography of the lymphoedema of legs

Journal:Phlebologie
ISSN:0939-978X
Issue:2008 (Vol. 37): Issue 5 2008 (227-282)
Pages:247-252

Comparison of standardised lymphoscintigraphic function test and high resolution sonography of the lymphoedema of legs

W. J. Brauer1; V. S. Brauer2
1Radiologische Abteilung und Praxis für Nuklearmedizin (Chefarzt: Dr. med. W. J. Brauer), Kreiskrankenhaus Emmendingen, Germany; 2IBED-Aquatic Microbiology (Director: Prof. Dr. J. Huisman), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Summary

Purpose: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative sonography with the lymphoscintigraphic function test and clinical findings in legs. Patients, methods: In 33 patients a lymphoscintigraphic function test of legs combined with measurement of lymph node uptake was performed and subsequently compared with sonography. Sonographic criteria were: Thickness of cutis, thickness of subcutanean fatty tissue and presence of liquid structures or fine disperse tissue structure of lower limbs, foots and toes. Results: In 51 legs uptake values lie in the pathologic area, in four legs in the grey area and in ten legs in the normal area. The cutis thickness in the lower leg shows no significant correlation with the uptake. The determination of the thickness of the subcutanean fatty tissue of the lower leg and of the cutis thickness of the feet turned out to be an unreliable method. In 47% of the medial lower legs and in 57% of the lateral lower legs with clinical lymphoedema sonography is falsely negative. Conclusion: Early lymphoedema is only detectable with the lymphoscintigraphic function test. In the case of clinical lymphoedema clinical examination is more reliable than sonography.

Keywords

sonography, lymphoscintigraphy, Lymphoedema, oedema

You may also be interested in...

1.

A. J. van Geest (1) , S. C. A. M. Esten (2) , J-P R. A. Cambier (2) , E. G. J. Gielen (2) , A. Kessels (3), H. A. M. Neumann (4) , M. J. P. G. van Kroonenburgh (2)

Phlebologie 2003 32 6: 138-142

2.

M. Marshall1 , D. Loew2 , C. Schwahn-Schreiber3

Phlebologie 2005 34 3: 157-164

3.

E. Brenner

Phlebologie 2005 34 3: 143-145