Advertisement

Multi-screen electronic alerts to augment venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-09-0634
Issue:2010: 103/2 (Feb) pp. 251–479
Pages:312-317

Multi-screen electronic alerts to augment venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

K. Fiumara (1), C. Piovella (2), S. Hurwitz (3), G. Piazza (2, 3), C. M. Niles (2), J. Fanikos (1), M. Paterno (4), M. Labreche (1), L.-A. Stevens (2), S. Baroletti (1), S. Z. Goldhaber (5)
(1) Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA; (2) Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA; (3) Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA; (4) Information Systems, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA; (5) Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Summary

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in high-risk patients is frequently underutilised. We previously devised a one-screen computer alert program that identified hospitalised patients at high risk for VTE who were not receiving prophylaxis and advised their physicians to prescribe prophylaxis. While this strategy reduced the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE by 41%, the majority of electronic alerts were ignored. We have now developed a serial three-screen alert computer program designed to educate physicians who initially declined to order prophylaxis after a single screen alert. Of a total cohort of 880, the responsible physicians for 425 patients received a single electronic alert, whereas 455 who declined prophylaxis after the first screen received the second and third screens of the novel three-screen alert. Our enhanced serial three-screen alert program generated VTE prophylaxis orders for 58.4% of the 455 patients whose physicians initially declined to order prophylaxis following the one-screen alert. There was no significant difference in symptomatic 90-day VTE rates between the two cohorts (2.8% for the one-screen vs. 2.2% for the three-screen, p=0.55). We conclude that our three-screen computer alert program can markedly increase prophylaxis among physicians who decline an initial single screen alert.

Keywords

pulmonary embolism, Deep venous thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, prophylaxis, Computerised decision support

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-09-0634

You may also be interested in...

1.

H. Leon Daneschvar1, Ali Seddighzadeh1, Gregory Piazza2, Samuel Z. Goldhaber1

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 6: 1035-1039

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-02-0107

2.

Cihan Ay1,*, Lea V. Jungbauer2,*, Alexandra Kaider3, Silvia Koder1, Simon Panzer4, Ingrid Pabinger1, Christine Mannhalter2

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 5: 899-904

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-11-0672

3.

Jurga Adomaityte, Maria Farooq, Rehan Qayyum

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 2: 338-342

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-07-0468



Articles

You've 197 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH107.2

With the expiry or pending expiry of originator low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) patents,...

TH 107.1

T&H has a new type of article! Read the first T&H Insights article by Lutgens et al. in the...

TH 106.6

Read the important position document from the European Heart Rhythm Association [EHRA] and the...