Advertisement

Anticardiolipin Antibody Assay: a Methodological Analysis for a better Consensus in Routine Determinations A Cooperative Project of the European Antiphospholipid Forum

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
Issue:2001: 86/2 (Aug) pp.509-727
Pages:575-583

Anticardiolipin Antibody Assay: a Methodological Analysis for a better Consensus in Routine Determinations A Cooperative Project of the European Antiphospholipid Forum

Angela Tincani, Flavio Allegri, Marielle Sanmarco (1) , Massimo Cinquini, Marco Taglietti, Genesio Balestrieri, Takao Koike (2) , Kenji Ichikawa (2) , Pierluigi Meroni (3) , Marie Claire Boffa (4)
Clinical Immunology Unit, Brescia Hospital, Italy; (1) Laboratoire d’Immunologie, Hopital de la Conception, Marseille, France; (2) Department of Medicine II, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan; (3) IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano,

Summary

Despite the widely recognized practical importance of anticardiolipin(aCL) ELISA, the reliability of this test has been recently discussed.In order to investigate this area on European scale, we sent to 30 experiencedcenters a questionnaire focusing on the diagnostic proceduresapplied to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and on thedetailed protocols used to perform aCL. Anticardiolipin ELISA wasfound to be the most frequently performed test in patients with suspectedAPS, but significant difference was shown among the various protocols.The cross-laboratory multiple examination of ten serum samplesevaluated independently by the 24 centers pointed out the difficulty ingetting comparable results. Therefore a “consensus” protocol was derivedfrom the aCL methods giving the best performance. The materi-alsand reagents necessary to perform the “consensus” method, including,as putative standards, one IgG and one IgM monoclonal antibody(HCAL and EY2C9) were distributed to 19 Centers. The results of oneIgG and one IgM aCL high positive sera measured in serial dilutionswere compared. A progressive decrease in the variability of the valuesobtained for a given sample appeared evident when all the laboratoriesused the same standard, in their own in-house ELISA and even more inthe “consensus” ELISA.Our data show that aCL ELISA standardization is necessary in orderto obtain comparable results in different laboratories.

TH 109.5

The May 2013 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 109.5 is a clinically relevant 'state of the art'...

TH 109.4

Starting with the April 2013 issue of "Thrombosis and Haemostasis" TH109.4, the ESC...

TH 109.3

The March 2013 issue TH 109.3 of Thrombosis and Haemostasis is a Theme Issue by Guest Editors...