Comparison of methods for monitoring residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel by point-of-care tests on whole blood in high-risk patients

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-12-0832
Issue:2010: 104/2 (Aug) pp. 191– 419
Pages:287-292

Comparison of methods for monitoring residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel by point-of-care tests on whole blood in high-risk patients

R. Paniccia (1, 2), E. Antonucci (1), N. Maggini (1, 3), M. Miranda (1), A. M. Gori (3, 1, 2), R. Marcucci (1, 2), B. Giusti (1, 2), D. Balzi (4), D. Prisco (1, 2), R. Abbate (1, 2)

(1) Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, Thrombosis Center, University of Florence, Italy; (2) Department of Heart and Vessels, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Italy; (3) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Centro S. Maria degli Ulivi-IRCCS, Florence, Italy; (4) Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Firenze, Florence, Italy

Summary

Cardiovascular events are more frequent in high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with a residual platelet reactivity (RPR) than in those showing inhibition of ADP-inducible platelet activation. It is known that post-interventional RPR is a clinically important entity confirming it as a risk factor for thrombo-ischaemic events. Multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA) on whole blood has been recently proposed as a rapid tool to evaluate RPR in high-risk CAD patients on clopidogrel therapy. It was the aim of this study to detect RPR in 801 high-risk CAD patients on dual antiplatelet therapy comparing MEA with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay on whole blood and classical light transmission aggregation (LTA) on platelet-rich plasma. ADP (10 μM) was employed as agonist for MEA and LTA. The prevalence of RPR was 20.6% by MEA, 16.1% by LTA and 30.8% by VerifyNow. MEA showed a significant correlation (rho=0.62, p<0.0001) with VerifyNow and a moderate agreement (k=0.52, p<0.001) with 81.5% of concordant values. A significant correlation was found between MEA and LTA (rho=0.71, p<0.001) with a good agreement (k=0.63, p<0.001) and 88.8% of concordant values. MEA in relation to LTA showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 91%. MEA might represent a reliable method and valid alternative in comparison with other available platelet function assays. It might help to guide antiplatelet therapy and thus improve clinical outcome of high-risk CAD patients.

Keywords

multiple electrode aggregometry, point-of-care testing, light transmission aggregometry, Residual platelet reactivity, Clopidogrel therapy

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-12-0832

You may also be interested in...

1.

Joseph A. Jakubowski1, Christopher D. Payne2, Ying G. Li1, John T. Brandt1, David S. Small1, Nagy A. Farid1, Daniel E. Salazar3, Kenneth J. Winters1

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2008 99 2: 409-415

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-09-0575

2.

Ingrid Leichsenring1, Winfried Plesch1, Volker Unkrig1, Steve Kitchen2, Dianne P. Kitchen2, Rhona Maclean2, Bert Dikkeschei3, Anton M. H. P. van den Besselaar4

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2007 97 5: 856-861

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH06-12-0740

3.

Orsolya Tóth1,2, Andreas Calatzis3, Sandra Penz1, Hajna Losonczy2, Wolfgang Siess1

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2006 96 6: 781-788

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH06-05-0242



Articles

You've 1019 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...