Venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer

Journal:Thrombosis and Haemostasis
ISSN:0340-6245
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-04-0242
Issue:2007: 98/3 (Sep) pp. 483-704
Pages:656-661

Venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer

Ali Seddighzadeh, Ranjith Shetty, Samuel Z. Goldhaber
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussetts, USA

Summary

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).To further define the demographics, comorbidities, and risk factors of VTE in these patients, we analyzed a prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from 183 hospitals in the United States. Cancer was reported in 1,768 (39%), of whom 1,096 (62.0%) had active cancer. Of these, 599 (54.7%) were receiving chemotherapy, and 226 (20.6%) had metastases. Lung (18.5%), colorectal (11.8%), and breast cancer (9.0%) were among the most common cancer types. Cancer patients were younger (median age 66 years vs. 70 years; p<0.0001), were more likely to be male (50.4% vs. 44.5%; p=0.0005), and had a lower average body mass index (26.6 kg/m2 vs. 28.9 kg/m2; p<0.0001). Cancer patients less often received VTE prophylaxis prior to development of DVT compared to those with no cancer (308 of 1,096, 28.2% vs. 1,196 of 3,444, 34.6%; p<0.0001). For DVT therapy, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as monotherapy without warfarin (142 of 1,086, 13.1% vs. 300 of 3,429, 8.7%; p<0.0001) and inferior vena caval filters (234 of 1,086, 21.5% vs. 473 of 3,429, 13.8%; p<0.0001) were utilized more often in cancer patients than in DVT patients without cancer. Cancer patients with DVT and neurological disease were twice as likely to receive inferior vena caval filters than those with no cancer (odds ratio 2.17, p=0.005). In conclusion, cancer patients who develop DVT receive prophylaxis less often and more often receive filters than patients with no cancer who develop DVT. Future studies should focus on ways to improve implementation of prophylaxis in cancer patients and to further define the indications, efficacy, and safety of inferior vena caval filters in this population.

Keywords

cancer, low-molecular-weight heparin, Venous thrombosis, prophylaxis, inferior vena caval filter

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH07-04-0242

You may also be interested in...

1.
A randomised controlled trial

L. Traby (1), A. Kaider (2), R. Schmid (3), A. Kranz (3), P. Quehenberger (4), P. A. Kyrle (1), S. Eichinger (1)

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010 104 1: 92-99

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-12-0863

2.
A decision analysis

M. Blondon (1), A. Perrier (1), M. Nendaz (1), M. Righini (2), F. Boehlen (2), M. Boulvain (3), P. De Moerloose (2)

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010 103 1: 129-137

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH09-06-0349

3.

Shaker A. Mousa1; Lars J. Petersen2

Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2009 102 2: 258-267

http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-12-0832



Articles

You've 1002 Article(s) in your Basket.

TH 107.5

Clinical Focus on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors: In the May issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Armstrong...

TH 107.4

The April 2012 issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis TH 107.4 is a Theme Issue by A. Schober, T....

Thrombosis and Haemostasis official organ of Spanish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, founded in 1957, has become the official organ of the Spanish Society...