D. Filipowicz (1), O. Lanz (2), R. McLaughlin (3), S. Elder (4), S. Werre (4)
(1) Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia, USA; (2) Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia, USA; (3) Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, USA; (4) Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, USA
3.5 locking compression plate (LCP) fixation was compared to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) fixation in a canine cadaveric, distal humeral metaphyseal gap model. Thirty paired humeri from adult, large breed dogs were separated into equal groups based on testing: static compression, cyclic compression, and cyclic torsion. Humeral constructs stabilised with LCP were significantly stiffer than those plated with LC-DCP when loaded in static axial compression (P = 0.0004). When cyclically loaded in axial compression, the LCP constructs were significantly less stiff than the LC-DCP constructs (P = 0.0029). Constructs plated with LCP were significantly less resistant to torsion over 500 cycles than those plated with LC-DCP (P<0.0001). The increased stiffness of LCP constructs in monotonic loading compared to constructs stabilised with non-locking plates may be attributed to the stability afforded by the plate-screw interface of locking plates. The LCP constructs demonstrated less stiffness in dynamic testing in this model, likely due to plate-bone offset secondary to non-anatomic contouring and occasional incomplete seating of the locking screws when using the torque-limiting screw driver. Resolution of these aspects of LCP application may help improve the stiffness of fixation in fractures modeled by the experimental set-up of this investigation.
LCP, LC-DCP, Fracture model, axial compression, cyclic torsion
M. DeTora1, K. Kraus2
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008 21 4: 318-322
A. Z. Aguila1 , J. M. Manos2 , A. S. Orlansky2 , R. J. Todhunter1 , E. J. Trotter 1 , M. C. H. van der Meulen2
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005 18 4: 220-226
F. M. Little, C. M. Hill, T. Kageyama, M. G Conzemius, G. K. Smith
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001 14 2: 64-68
Animal models are quite often used for the testing of new implants and surgical procedures, and...
Despite there being significant development over the past years in veterinary orthopaedics, it is ...
As you may have already read in the last issue of 2013, VCOT has decided to issue an annual award...