Please note that all articles available in PrePrint Online are not necessarily the final, author corrected version of the paper. For more information on PrePrint Online, click
here.
![]() |
|
M. Zeissler (1), J. Maierl (2), V. Grevel (1), G. Oechtering (1), P. Böttcher (1)
(1) Department of Small Animal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; (2) Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
Objective: To characterise the humeral trochlea in middle to large breed dogs in respect to split-line pattern and cartilage thickness. Methods: In 15 paired cadaveric elbow joints of mature dogs (>20 kg body weight) collagen network orientation of the hyaline cartilage of the humeral trochlea was visualised using a traditional split-line technique in which a dissecting needle dipped in India ink was inserted into the cartilage (n = 10). Cartilage thickness was measured radiographically on osteochondral plugs harvested at four representative locations within the joint surface of the humeral trochlea (n = 15). Results: The joint surface of the humeral trochlea showed a distinct pattern of centripetally oriented split-lines with less pronounced or even absent split-lines caudo- proximally towards the olecranon fossa. Median cartilage thickness at the canine humeral trochlea was 0.51 mm (interquartile range: 0.42 – 0.61 mm). Centrally, at the region where osteochondrosis lesions commonly occur in middle to large breed dogs, the median cartilage thickness was 0.55 mm (interquartile range: 0.48 – 0.62 mm). Clinical significance: When focusing on anatomical joint resurfacing while performing osteochondral transplantation at the canine humeral trochlea, transplants should be implanted such that their split-lines are oriented centripetally. Hyaline cartilage thickness of transferred grafts should be in the range of half a millimetre to optimally match the situation at the canine humeral trochlea.
dog, osteochondritis dissecans, Cartilage thickness, split-lines, humeral trochlea
| 1. | ||
E. Kulendra1, K. Lee2, S. Schoeniger3, A. P. Moores1,3 VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2008 21 2: 152-155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-07-05-0042 | ||
| 2. | ||
M. Olivieri1, E. Ciliberto2, D. A. Hulse3, A. Vezzoni4, F. Ingravalle5, B. Peirone2 VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2007 20 1: 65-69 | ||
| 3. | ||
I. Gielen, B. van Ryssen, H. van Bree VCOT - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2005 18 2: 77-82 | ||